Google, following at the heels of OpenAI, revealed a coverage proposal in line with the Trump Management’s name for a countrywide “AI Motion Tactic.” The tech massive counseled vulnerable copyright restrictions on AI coaching, in addition to “balanced” export controls that “give protection to nationwide safety whilst enabling U.S. exports and international trade operations.”
“The U.S. must pursue an lively global financial coverage to suggest for American values and give a boost to AI innovation across the world,” Google wrote within the record. “For too lengthy, AI policymaking has paid disproportionate consideration to the hazards, continuously ignoring the prices that erroneous law may have on innovation, nationwide competitiveness, and medical management — a dynamic this is starting to shift underneath the brand new Management.”
One in every of Google’s extra debatable suggestions relates to the usage of IP-protected subject matter.
Google argues that “truthful use and text-and-data mining exceptions” are “vital” to AI building and AI-related medical innovation. Like OpenAI, the corporate seeks to codify the appropriate for it and competitors to coach on publicly to be had records — together with copyrighted records— in large part with out restriction.
“Those exceptions permit for the usage of copyrighted, publicly to be had subject matter for AI coaching with out considerably impacting rightsholders,” Google wrote, “and steer clear of continuously extremely unpredictable, imbalanced, and long negotiations with records holders all the way through fashion building or medical experimentation.”
Google, which has skilled various fashions on publicly to be had, copyrighted records, is scuffling with complaints with records house owners who accuse the corporate of failing to inform and compensate them prior to doing so. U.S. courts haven’t begun to make a decision whether or not truthful use doctrine successfully shields AI builders from IP litigation.
In its proposal, Google additionally takes factor with export controls imposed underneath the Biden Admininstration, which it says “might undermine financial competitiveness targets” by means of “implementing disproportionate burdens on U.S. cloud carrier suppliers.” That contrasts with statements from Google competition like Microsoft, which in January mentioned that it was once “assured” it will “comply absolutely” with the foundations.
Importantly, the export laws carve out exemptions for depended on firms in quest of massive clusters of complex AI chips.
In different places in its proposal, Google requires “long-term, sustained” investments in foundational home R&D, pushing again in opposition to fresh federal efforts to scale back spending and get rid of grant awards. The corporate mentioned the federal government will have to unlock records units that could be useful for business AI coaching, and allocate investment to “early-market R&D” whilst making sure computing and fashions are “broadly to be had” to scientists and establishments.
Pointing to the chaotic regulatory setting created by means of the U.S.’ patchwork of state AI regulations, Google recommended the federal government to move federal regulation on AI, together with a unified privateness and safety framework. Simply over two months into 2025, the choice of pending AI expenses within the U.S. has grown to 781, in step with a web based monitoring software.
Google cautions the U.S. govt in opposition to implementing what it perceives to be laborious duties round AI methods, like utilization legal responsibility duties. In lots of circumstances, Google argues, the developer of a fashion “has little to no visibility or keep an eye on” over how a fashion is being utilized by a developer and thus shouldn’t undergo duty for misuse.
“Even in circumstances the place a developer supplies a fashion at once to deployers, deployers will continuously be best possible positioned to grasp the hazards of downstream makes use of, put in force efficient possibility control, and behavior post-market
tracking and logging,” Google wrote.
Google often known as disclosure necessities like the ones being pondered by means of the EU “overly extensive,” and mentioned the U.S. govt will have to oppose transparency laws that require “divulging business secrets and techniques, permit competition to copy merchandise, or compromise nationwide safety by means of offering a roadmap to adversaries on tips on how to circumvent protections or jailbreak fashions.”
